old tumblr postsPosted on

About tagging art as me I don’t understand because I don’t do this as otherkin but because i identify with a character, same as other fandom people tagging as my son, my husband, my child, etc. I thought this was the same as tagging with your love for a character so I’m so confused, I was happy to see that in fandom you can tag your love and fascination for a character or show and I thought tagging me was another way to do this, not a kin thing. I see non kin doing that too with fanart.

Its good to see I’m not the only one with a confused perspective on the phenomenon. Before the outcry, I wouldn’t have known that people…

Read More
old tumblr postsPosted on

Thank you for your reply, I understand and it’s a good point but I think that while classifications are good to make things clear dividing a small community with close experiences in two against the wishes of some of them is not ideal. I also think the otherkin community wants only people who believe it’s an spiritual thing lately, I mean between coping kin and people who believe being kin is psychological or anything not spiritual there isn’t such a big diference and both tend to be excluded.

I think its important to share space- but I also think its important to have dedicated spaces to both. We have similar experiences, and a…

Read More
old tumblr postsPosted on

I believe healthy multiplicity is real and your anon is missing the point, psychology is supposed to explain the workings of the mind not own them and only allow for their worldview to exist, so please don’t assume I’m one of those anons, but I think that what people like the anon are doing to you reminds me of what otherkin like you do to other kin, you define who can be part of the community by your views, like being against coping kin, according to my worldview as kin that is possible.

Sorry this took me longer to get to! You have a point! The difference is that I absolutely believe that copingkin exist as a phenomenon…

Read More
old tumblr postsPosted on

Other sources beyond Vessiere’s study include: Multiplying models: Personal identity, dissociation and the possibility of healthy multiplicity by Gale, Lindsey and Alterity: Learning polyvalent selves, resisting disabling notions of the self by Walker, Wayland. We can gather from these that healthy multiplicity is indeed A Thing that happens. What we -cannot- gather is what causes it. To label all non-DID or DDNOS systems as imitation systems or BPD is a huge oversight and logically unsound.

Read More
old tumblr postsPosted on

how is telling you the literal definition of something applying the standards of a disorder? i’m telling you what a term specific to a disorder means. you’re clearly not listening. being multiple means that there’s dissociative barriers between personality states. if that’s not your experience, why are you using that label for yourself? actually answer the question, you keep avoiding it.

I am using the label for myself because the label applies to me. The label multiple applies to me, because I am a member of…

Read More
old tumblr postsPosted on

I wonder if multianon has any sources that can prove that being a singlet is inherently healthy. Probably not, since healthiness in singlets is something implied. I don’t know why it’s suddenly so unbelievable in the context of multiple systems that they wouldn’t have clinically significant distress as a result of being multiple (which according to the DSM 5 is the key defining factor of what makes someone disordered in the first place).

Good point!

Read More
old tumblr postsPosted on

just because we haven’t worked out everything about the brain doesn’t mean that we know nothing. also @ the other anon, i’m aware of the ableism in the psychiatric field, but that doesn’t make all psychiatry completely incorrect. also note that modern psychology is based on decades of research and studies. while we have hundreds of books and reports on the topic, what do you have? a couple of teenagers on the internet claiming to know better than people who have spent years studying?

I’m 30, anon. And I’ve been consciously multiple for half my lifetime. Most of the people in the multiplicity communities I’ve been a part of…

Read More
old tumblr postsPosted on

i’m speaking as someone currently studying psychology at university. the literal definition of a system is someone whose personality didn’t integrate. please actually look this up, this is a known fact. if your personality is integrated you’re not multiple. if you’re going to claim to be multiple people with an integrated personality, can you at least not steal our terms.

*facepalm* Wow, anon, the point and you miss again! 1) obviously a psychology textbook would define mlultiplicty through the lens of disorder. They’re not going…

Read More
old tumblr postsPosted on

not believing me about being diagnosed just because you disagree with me is childish. also there’s literally no-non DID/OSDD-1 basis for natural multiples to exist unless they’re not actually dissociative, and therefore not a system. imitative DID is where someone with an unstable personality (usually someone with BPD believes their facets are alters because they feel like different people.) takes on the social role of someone with DID and claims to be multiple, despite being a singlet.

no-non DID/OSDD-1 basis for natural multiples  Whoops, you missed the point again, anon! Natural multiples exist, get this, outside of the psychiatric purview.  Natural multiples…

Read More